Author: Terry McCracken
Date: 21:10:18 01/28/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 28, 2003 at 23:59:33, Dann Corbit wrote: >On January 28, 2003 at 22:03:56, Carlos Lantigua wrote: > >>Let´s be sincere, a super GM of the calibre of Kasparov couldnt missed the >>winning move 25, imagine if Kasparov would won game 2, the match wouldnt be >>interesting for the public and for the comercial interest of DJ, Kasparov and DJ >>team agree he would win the match on a very narrow margin, perhaps 1 or 1/2, >>thus Kasparov and DJ would be happy. >> >>PS, excuseme my bad English.) > >After a very deep computer search, an advantage of less than a pawn is shown for >f4. I suspect that one hour per move computer search by a very fast machine >with a very good program will find at least one mistake in every GM match with >more than a trivial number of moves. > >On the other hand, a super GM spending one hour per move will also surely find >at least one mistake in every computer/computer match. > >Kasparov's ego should be apparent from when he lost the second Deep Blue match. >Even if he agreed to throw it, I suspect he would go ahead and clobber anyway if >he could. > >He has a win as white and a draw as black. Quite frankly, I think both parties >have performed superbly up to this point. > >Can you draw Kasparov? > >Surely, Kasparov has prepared like a madman. He does not want the embarassment >of losing to a machine again. I doubt if a billion dollars would make him throw >the match. He already has money. What will he sell his reputation for? > >Be serious. Quite correct! And more than reputation, would be lost. Why people don't get this is incomprehensible! Terry
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.