Author: allan johnson
Date: 23:39:57 01/29/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 29, 2003 at 21:30:43, Roger D Davis wrote: >On January 29, 2003 at 19:20:12, allan johnson wrote: > >> Okay I can accept your rationale.Nonetheless even if the outcome is as you >>predict mathematics and chance come into play and there is still no evidence >>that the match was fixed. >>Al > >I don't think there will EVER be evidence the match was fixed, but that's >exactly what you would expect if there was a conspiracy. hehe. ;) > >If it turns out that the data fit the Conspiracy theory, I'll have to say so, of >course. No one else has generated a competing Conspiracy theory so far, so I'm >assuming that I have the best one, or at least the only one that lays claim to >predictive power and is open to falsification. > >I'd be more than happy to see Kasparov trounce DJ. > >Roger So will I Roger so will I. Al
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.