Author: Roger D Davis
Date: 18:30:43 01/29/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 29, 2003 at 19:20:12, allan johnson wrote: > Okay I can accept your rationale.Nonetheless even if the outcome is as you >predict mathematics and chance come into play and there is still no evidence >that the match was fixed. >Al I don't think there will EVER be evidence the match was fixed, but that's exactly what you would expect if there was a conspiracy. hehe. ;) If it turns out that the data fit the Conspiracy theory, I'll have to say so, of course. No one else has generated a competing Conspiracy theory so far, so I'm assuming that I have the best one, or at least the only one that lays claim to predictive power and is open to falsification. I'd be more than happy to see Kasparov trounce DJ. Roger
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.