Author: Sune Fischer
Date: 17:42:01 02/03/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 03, 2003 at 19:52:42, Rolf Tueschen wrote: > >Yes. Of course. Alas, the mean computer experts have invented the 6 games >"matches" and that is too short to exploit and harvest. Let them play 48 games >with the same machine of course. Promissed? > >:) > >Rolf Tueschen If Garry is the best player of the two he should be able to win without a 48 game disection of the program. What would the conclusion be if he needed 48 games to win, that GK can only win if he can completely pridict his opponents moves? It's kind of like playing poker when you can see the other guys hand. Cheating is another word for it. Of course _if_ these had been the rules I think the programmers would have devoted a little more time to the development of learning heuristic, so it may not be a very big issue after all. I mean it's not that difficult to have the program change a few of the parameters from game to game, ie. simply loading different "personalities" by random. -S.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.