Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Statistical methods and their consequences

Author: Jonas Cohonas

Date: 00:18:31 02/15/03

Go up one level in this thread


Very off topic in the meantime, so I will give my last message. You are funny. I
>like your messages but you have a general habit to teach me.

Just suggestions Rolf, not orders.
I am not trying to teach you anything, teaching you would imply that i am right
in what i say, but i am not sure that i am, i have pointed this out before.

That is normally
>the job of a lay psychologist. [Real psychologists dont do that.]

See previous comment.

>All what you say is important for all kind of spin doctors.

There you go again with the spindoctor, do you honestly think that is what i am
doing?

But I am not such a
>species. I am a totally free "scientist" in such talks. Also, I don't want to
>persuade people. You have no understanding for me. None. This is a pity. Do you
>believe that a guy like Walser looks what people think or expect? Did you never
>reflect such positions? I write the best that I can! And the rest is to others.
>Most debates go about misunderstandings. Or when I had asked questions - since I
>am a lay in CC! But when I talk about statistics or other topics, I have enough
>knowledge.
>
>From 1996 on, from my first contact in rgcc, I always met people who start to
>tell me how I should behave, don't you find that crazy? Is that a CC deficiency?

Maybe there is something in your behaviour that you might need to look at, given
that general response you just discribed.

>I am psychologist but I would ever do that.

I thought you were a scientist :)

>Next point. Wider, more. Would you say that I get no reactions? :)

No, but you would probably have more people wanting to "get" you point/s.

>And then! People I have enough who talk with me, but I would seek for real
>experts. And they are perhaps not here. I mean real scientists. Bob is the only
>one I know.

>Could we now end this very personal debate? It has a disadvantage because I
>don't know you.

Well i don't know you either, but i am fine with this debate, however if it
makes you uncomfortable to discus on a personal level, then by all means let's
drop it.

BTW just stating the obvious, it is through personal relations you get to know
someone.

Regards
Jonas



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.