Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 15:19:40 02/16/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 16, 2003 at 18:13:42, Peter Berger wrote: >On February 16, 2003 at 17:59:14, Rolf Tueschen wrote: > >>On February 16, 2003 at 17:48:19, Peter Berger wrote: >> >>>No Rolf, my comment is only about chess - I am convinced that Nxg4 is simply the >>>very strongest move and everything else is garbage. Feel welcome to challenge >>>this assessment with analysis either of your own or published one - but please >>>don't forget to add another move that leads to at least a position of similar >>>merit. >>> >>>I think Nxg4 is a very good example for a move played by a computer that looks >>>weak to amateurs unless they spend a lot of time looking at the position and has >>>the potential to even fool players of higher strength. It looks messy, but is >>>strong. >>> >>>Regards, >>>Peter >> >> >>Ok, let's take only that chess question. You say the move is fantastic? > >OK ;) - yes I actually do in fact. > >So it >>wins? I say it is a bad LINE and perhaps Nxg4 is the "best" move. But it is >>still in a bad line. Michael said Black must avoid the 0-0. Read his message. He >>also gives the neccessary moves. I won't imposter with his moves. >> > >I have analyzed the game - I didn't follow the thread you are referring to. >Please point me to the post you want to discuss. > >Thanks in advance. >Peter http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?284683
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.