Author: Ralph Patriquin
Date: 16:31:52 02/17/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 16, 2003 at 21:14:34, Peter McKenzie wrote: >>The point is easy. The whole line, Peter, is bad for Black. See the post from >>Michael. I gave the number to Peter Berger. Michael showed, and others before on >>the servers, that White had advantage. Not to be proven with whole lines of 40 >>plies but still visible. Of course Kasparov played exactly NOT the line that led >>to advantage. So back to Nxg4. After g4 played, yes, then Nxg4 might be the best >>move. But NOT in a sense that it's a good move. If Nxg4 is a "good" move then >>the whole lie is bull, that is the summary of that line. And the early 0-0 is >>the reason for that mess. So, to begin with you must avoid to play 0-0. > >But Bob wasn't talking about O-O, he was talking about Nxg4. And I answered >Bob, so I was also taking about Nxg4. Yes, we were both talking about Nxg4 I >think. > >Get it? > >Repeat after me 100 times: we were talking about Nxg4 > > >Having a conversation with you is funny: > >The dog is brown. > >No no no no, you are so wrong, you said the dog was green! But really the cat >is white!!! > >But the dog is brown I tell you! > >Look, that cat is definitely white, can't you see that? If only you could >understand the physics of light you would know the cat was white. You clearly >are under the influence of propoganda, big business, greed, corruption and Star >Trek. > >Damn, and here I was thinking the dog was brown ... LOL! Spot on! The only flaw is your English was better. ;) Ralph
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.