Author: Peter McKenzie
Date: 18:14:34 02/16/03
Go up one level in this thread
>The point is easy. The whole line, Peter, is bad for Black. See the post from >Michael. I gave the number to Peter Berger. Michael showed, and others before on >the servers, that White had advantage. Not to be proven with whole lines of 40 >plies but still visible. Of course Kasparov played exactly NOT the line that led >to advantage. So back to Nxg4. After g4 played, yes, then Nxg4 might be the best >move. But NOT in a sense that it's a good move. If Nxg4 is a "good" move then >the whole lie is bull, that is the summary of that line. And the early 0-0 is >the reason for that mess. So, to begin with you must avoid to play 0-0. But Bob wasn't talking about O-O, he was talking about Nxg4. And I answered Bob, so I was also taking about Nxg4. Yes, we were both talking about Nxg4 I think. Get it? Repeat after me 100 times: we were talking about Nxg4 Having a conversation with you is funny: The dog is brown. No no no no, you are so wrong, you said the dog was green! But really the cat is white!!! But the dog is brown I tell you! Look, that cat is definitely white, can't you see that? If only you could understand the physics of light you would know the cat was white. You clearly are under the influence of propoganda, big business, greed, corruption and Star Trek. Damn, and here I was thinking the dog was brown ...
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.