Author: Sune Fischer
Date: 08:23:04 02/20/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 20, 2003 at 10:54:45, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >On February 20, 2003 at 10:31:57, Sune Fischer wrote: > >>>Wrong. Intellectuals first should have the minimum of education. Listening makes >>>no sense if you lack of education. >> >>How do you get educated if you don't listen? > >Easy one. As I said. I am educated in stats. Your serve. I'm bachelor in mathemathics and physics. Ball on your court. >>No I am saying it _probably_ does increase, a little due to better tools and >>advances in chess over time. > >Again, you don't understand. Chess makes progress, yes. But that is no reason to >believe that the talents of chessplayers change. Rolf you really are not listening one word to what I'm saying, please pay attention for one microsecond, do me that favor will you? Once again... Assume talent is the same, man is the same, chess progresses => stronger top players. >With Bob I say the average is >the same. The average is a _different_ discussion, but same principle applies, though probably to a much lesser extent. >>>Well - we see we have a seemingly contradiction. And I am saying >>>that this is only understood by educated people. >> >>Let us break down that sentence so even the moderators can see what you are >>doing here. Allow me to rephrase: >>"Sune, you can't understand this, you are too damn stupid, you do not have an >>education". > >Nope. Uneducated doesn't mean stupid. Education related to a specific field is >required. That having said does NOT mean that you must be stupid without! All it >says is that you can't understand the points in the field. I can't understand mumbojumbo no, that is correct. But you claim to be an educated man, so PROVE me wrong. We don't need all this babble us two educated people, do we. Show me the math, prove me wrong. >>Your version passes the charter (apparently?), mine falls through. This is what >>I mean by war game Rolf, you balance the charter all the time. >>To you it is a game of who can make the worst insults without breaking the >>charter. Well it is a stupid game Rolf, I know you are an expert player but I'm >>not up it today, okay. >> >>I know there are a lot more insults in the text below (I will leave as an easy >>exercise for the reader to find them), but I'm not going to read them because I >>honestly find these dicussions extremely tiresome and pointless. > > >If that would breach the charter if I said that certain education is required to >understand stats, then the charter would be nonsense. But this isn't the case. >The charter forbids personal attacks. But with the statements I made I gave you >the necessary info what you could do to better understand. You are amazing Rolf, don't you think people know how to read between the lines? That comment about lack of education, was that not intended for me? What the heck was it for then? >This thread here, >Sune, speaks for itself. From its beginning where I was NOT participating. What does it say Rolf, you've lost me. -S. >Rolf Tueschen
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.