Author: Ed Schröder
Date: 10:30:23 10/07/98
Go up one level in this thread
>>If the answer is "YES", please produce some 40/2hr games where the >>programs have beaten (or broken even) with GM players. The last four >>games I personally watched ended up with the GM's ahead 3-1 in points, >>and the last time I checked my Elo performance rating for that, I get >>GM-200 for the rating... which is still in the 2400 range, where I've >>said they are all along... >>Not action chess. Not blitz chess. But real tournament chess. >>When I see real evidence this is wrong I'll certainly change my mind. >>But the evidence has to be doing respectably vs GM players, not trashing >>some FM/IM players... There's a difference.. And the games have to be >>40 moves in two hours or similar time controls... >Rebel 9 I guess is the best evidence I can think of that todays programs on >todays computers are better then 2500 elo.(if thats the standard) At Ageon 97 >Rebel 9 should have gone 4-0 Vs the IM's, but did score 3.5-.5. And did score >1-1 vs the GM's. No the games were not at 40/2 but it was slow enough to be >called real tournament chess I think. >Then kick in Rebel 10's score of .5-1.5 playing GM Anand a Super GM at 40/2hr. >And remember GM Anand has not allowed a draw from any IM player over the past >few years. If the CCC post I read was correct in this fact. >I think this shows that todays programs are better then IM's. And by default >the only thing better then an IM is a GM. >Ok the evidence is thin....but I took my best shot:) Add-up Mchess great results against GM's especially at Aegon. - Ed -
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.