Author: Tony Werten
Date: 22:54:20 03/23/03
Go up one level in this thread
On March 23, 2003 at 22:55:12, John Boyd wrote: >On March 23, 2003 at 10:51:54, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>many of us are doing that and have been doing it for many years. The first >>thing that comes to mind is how accurately are you finding "winning/even >>captures"? I use SEE and it is pretty accurate. If yours is not, that will >>cause lots of problems... > >Exactly. My "good capture" generator was asymmetric... ie. it was generating BxN >for black but NOT for white... messed the search up very nicely :) > >Now its fixed and it seems to be working fine. I'd love to implement a good SEE >but it looks quite tricky. Have to think about it before diving in. If you don't use a see, how can you generate good captures ? Only generating upcaptures and equal ones doesn't give you all the good ones. It just throws away a lot of moves in quiescence wich makes quiescence smaller but your branching factor bigger. (randomly throwing away moves will do the same for you) Tony > >Thanks, >Ross
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.