Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 20:25:54 04/10/03
Go up one level in this thread
On April 10, 2003 at 20:45:41, Tom Kerrigan wrote: >On April 10, 2003 at 11:34:59, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>I'm not knocking your box at all, as I said previously you have driven it to the >>lowest latency I have ever seen. But for every success story, there are a >>thousand >>horror stories. I've seen too many of 'em here. "It works fine on all the >>normal >>test programs but I am getting a program crash on my real application. When I >>turn the clock back down, it works fine." >> >>That's not the way to spend time debugging... > >What in the world is your point? That overclocking leads to bugs that are very difficult to find. Because they don't show up on _other_ machines. Was that too hard to understand? Join a discussion late and you miss a lot. > >That overclocked processors don't necessarily work right? I think that's already >crystal clear to everybody. Not to everybody. Which is why I mentioned the problem. > >I don't understand your need to chime in with what amounts to drivel every time >the word overclock is mentioned. Why did _you_ chime in? Did you offer anything? Didn't think so... > >-Tom
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.