Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 11:49:15 06/05/03
Go up one level in this thread
On June 05, 2003 at 14:39:13, Russell Reagan wrote: >On June 05, 2003 at 14:16:11, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>Are you using the weaker Winboard version with 313 KB Modified:Saturday, April >>05, 2003, 12:32:48 AM, Under Arena or Winboard ? >> >>or the stronger Chessbase version with an adapter with 36KB Modified:Thursday, >>May 24, 2001, 5:58:18 PM, under Chessbase GUI as an engine? >> >>And if you are using the chessbase engine version, what are your result in long >>time control? > >I am using whatever the latest version was from the SmarThink homepage under >Arena (downloaded it yesterday). I've only played two long games at 40 moves in >2 hours. So far it's Ruffian 1.5 - SmarThink 0.5. The latest version under Arena or winboard is about 100 rating point weaker than Ruffian 1.0.1 specially if you are using its own book. I already have tested them in a small match of 20 games and Ruffian won by 13.5 to 6.5 and against Pepito 1.59 is lost 12 to 8 under Arena. Pichard. >SmarThink is an interesting engine. During one game it thought about its move >for 47 minutes and 50 seconds! I don't know if the reason was that it was >failing low big time, or if it just had a lot of time left (it played 20 book >moves, so it had 2 hours to make 20 moves).
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.