Author: Aaron Tay
Date: 11:32:46 06/13/03
Go up one level in this thread
On June 13, 2003 at 12:34:44, Uri Blass wrote: >On June 13, 2003 at 12:03:58, Michael Vox wrote: > >>http://www.clubkasparov.ru/521772350.html?462691585533321 >> >>One could argue chess endgame tablebases play the endgame like god, but not this >>article.... >> >>Enjoy :) > > >The articles show no example when the tablebases are wrong. >Some cases when the engines are wrong in 5 piece endgames are simply because the >engine did not use the 5 piece tablebases. Really look at position 6 and the comments "Most likely due to the defects of the 5-piece tablebase, both engines evaluate this position as winning for White - " If the engines were not using the 5-piece tablebases how can this be "due to the defects of the 5-piece tablebase"? Clearly the writer thinks that he is using 5 pieces tablebases. I suppose you could read the sentence as saying that the engines are too depedent on 5-pieces tablebases and hence cannot figure out the right score without them, but that's unlikely I think. >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.