Author: Uri Blass
Date: 11:39:40 06/13/03
Go up one level in this thread
On June 13, 2003 at 14:32:46, Aaron Tay wrote: >On June 13, 2003 at 12:34:44, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On June 13, 2003 at 12:03:58, Michael Vox wrote: >> >>>http://www.clubkasparov.ru/521772350.html?462691585533321 >>> >>>One could argue chess endgame tablebases play the endgame like god, but not this >>>article.... >>> >>>Enjoy :) >> >> >>The articles show no example when the tablebases are wrong. >>Some cases when the engines are wrong in 5 piece endgames are simply because the >>engine did not use the 5 piece tablebases. > >Really look at position 6 and the comments > >"Most likely due to the defects of the 5-piece tablebase, both engines evaluate >this position as winning for White - " > >If the engines were not using the 5-piece tablebases how can this be "due to the >defects of the 5-piece tablebase"? Clearly the writer thinks that he is using 5 >pieces tablebases. I think that the defects are incomplete 5-piece tablebases. the writer seems to use only the tablebases that he got from chessbase when he bought Fritz. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.