Author: Uri Blass
Date: 15:24:55 06/22/03
Go up one level in this thread
On June 22, 2003 at 18:00:17, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: <snipped> >Because this has been showed with all the junior versions so far (none of the >versions could reproduce the games that it played in world champs before it, >that includes some strong moves) i assume that this is a willingly taken >decision. > >So in that respect i'm a bit surprised if he suddenly complains about junior8 >instead of junior6, junior7 etc. I see that I forgot to respond here so I think that no promise was made about Junior6 and Junior7. They did not promise even to provide a better version than the world championship(in the case of Junior8 there was a promise). Note that I do not think that Jnuior6 or Junior7 are weaker than previous non commercial version that is not dependent on the name of the opponent but even if they are weaker, no promise was broken. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.