Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Question about VC++6.0 compiler.

Author: Gerd Isenberg

Date: 13:39:43 07/02/03

Go up one level in this thread


On July 02, 2003 at 15:42:37, Jens Kahlenberg wrote:

>On July 02, 2003 at 15:18:28, Gerd Isenberg wrote:
>
>>On July 02, 2003 at 15:09:59, Russell Reagan wrote:
>>
>>>On July 02, 2003 at 15:07:05, Gerd Isenberg wrote:
>>>
>>>Hi Gerd,
>>>
>>>>Use max warning level
>>>
>>>I would not use the max warning levels in VC++ 6. One time I tried it, and I got
>>>96 warnings. 2 of them were from my code, and 94 of them were from Microsoft's
>>>header files.
>>
>>I guess there are some #pragmas to handle this.
>>At least you found two ;-)
>
>Hi Gerd,
>
>Of course you can switch off some "critical" warnings by pragmas, but that
>should be the job of M$ (in case of mentioned headers). AFAIC max warning level
>in VC++ 6 is more "dangerous" than useful because i might form a bad habit of
>underdiagnosing _important_ warnings ;-)
>
>Best regards,
>Jens

Hi Jens,

i'm fine with warning level 4 ;-)

Regards,
Gerd





This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.