Author: Jens Kahlenberg
Date: 14:08:48 07/02/03
Go up one level in this thread
On July 02, 2003 at 16:39:43, Gerd Isenberg wrote: >On July 02, 2003 at 15:42:37, Jens Kahlenberg wrote: > >>On July 02, 2003 at 15:18:28, Gerd Isenberg wrote: >> >>>On July 02, 2003 at 15:09:59, Russell Reagan wrote: >>> >>>>On July 02, 2003 at 15:07:05, Gerd Isenberg wrote: >>>> >>>>Hi Gerd, >>>> >>>>>Use max warning level >>>> >>>>I would not use the max warning levels in VC++ 6. One time I tried it, and I got >>>>96 warnings. 2 of them were from my code, and 94 of them were from Microsoft's >>>>header files. >>> >>>I guess there are some #pragmas to handle this. >>>At least you found two ;-) >> >>Hi Gerd, >> >>Of course you can switch off some "critical" warnings by pragmas, but that >>should be the job of M$ (in case of mentioned headers). AFAIC max warning level >>in VC++ 6 is more "dangerous" than useful because i might form a bad habit of >>underdiagnosing _important_ warnings ;-) >> >>Best regards, >>Jens > >Hi Jens, > >i'm fine with warning level 4 ;-) > >Regards, >Gerd Hi Gerd, i fear that i can't kick my level-3-habit ;-) But now a possibly useful link for debug vs release "problems" (never need to read that stuff, but website is normally worth some visits) http://www.codeguru.com/debug/ReleaseMode.shtml Regards, Jens
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.