Author: Chris Kantack
Date: 17:40:53 07/03/03
Go up one level in this thread
On July 03, 2003 at 08:49:46, Joachim Rang wrote: >Hi Chris, > >I do not really understand why you are so disappointed. I think most of the >answers were fair and helpful. Why bother with a few posts which critize you in >a way you would call unfair? Enjoy the helpful postings and simply ignore the >others, or discuss with them and try to persuade them if you like to do so. > >The CCC elects its moderators and with the moderators a certain moderation >philosophy. Every registered user can participate. So the moderation philosophy >reflects the majority of the forum members. I personally are very glad that here >are heat and tough discussion allowed. In Germany there all chess-forums heavily >moderated and every intersting but heat discussion is deleted. Quite >disappointing... > >regards Joachim > >P.S.: I find your meaning about DS quite unbalanced and provocative. >Nevertheless I found it quite intersting to read your opinion but I think other >should post there opinions too, right? > You make some good points. I'm only using the Deep Sjeng post as the latest example. I'm also referring to a lot of other postings that I've seen as well as comments I've heard from others I correspond with in the computer chess community. For example, Ron Nelson (a very active chess programmer for Excalibur...used to work on the Fidelity series of chess computers) no longer participates in this forum. Seems that much of the posters here only wish to discuss the latest, greatest, fastest, multiprocessor topics. There seems to be little room for discussing slower systems such as handhelds. Thanks Joachim for your comments! You are of course right that there is going to be "lively discussion" in any group that is not overly moderated. Chris
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.