Author: Brian Richardson
Date: 09:52:31 07/04/03
Go up one level in this thread
On July 03, 2003 at 21:45:54, Slater Wold wrote: >On July 03, 2003 at 21:42:17, Slater Wold wrote: > >>On July 03, 2003 at 19:58:22, Tom Kerrigan wrote: >> >>>On July 03, 2003 at 19:32:37, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>> >>>>On July 03, 2003 at 18:55:19, Brian Richardson wrote: >>>> >>>>>On July 03, 2003 at 18:26:33, Slater Wold wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>What are your results with your current exe, on the Crafty 'bench' test? >>>>> >>>>> Elapsed SMP Raw >>>>> Version CPUs time time-to-ply NPS >>>>>Opteron 244 (1.7GHz) 19.03 2 28 22.857143 1976833 >>>>>Opteron 244 (1.7GHz) 19.03 1 43 14.883721 1234812 >>>> >>>>That leaves me pretty cold. Dual 2.8ghz xeon, SMT on: >>>> >>>>Total nodes: 122846715 >>>>Raw nodes per second: 2082147 >>>>Total elapsed time: 59 >>>> >>>>This is a different version (19.4) so the time is not really comparable, >>>>but the NPS is, and the xeon is faster than the opteron. That looks ugly, >>>>although it obviously means the opteron is running 32 bit mode only, and it >>>>isn't very happy doing it. Be nice to get real 64 bit boolean operations >>>>up and going. >>> >>>"Isn't very happy"? What's wrong with it? What kind of #s does a dual Athlon >>>1.8GHz get? If the Opteron improves over the Athlon with 32 bit code (and I >>>suspect it does) it seems like there should be very little cause for complaint. >>>Add to that the fact that Opteron will almost ceratinly run 64 bit Crafty much >>>faster and we're talking about a 1st generation Opteron anyway. Rumor is, 2GHz >>>Opterons will be available on the 6th, and those should be 5% faster than your >>>dual 2.8 Xeon. >>> >>>-Tom >> >>Opterons are *much* faster than Athlons. >> >>My 2x1.73s got about 1.7M nps. > > >Opps! > >From the exe offered on Hyatt's website. > > >EPD Kit revision date: 1996.04.21 >found computer opening book file [./bookc.bin]. > >Crafty v18.15 (1 cpus) > >White(1): mt 2 >max threads set to 2 >White(1): bench >Running benchmark. . . >...... >Total nodes: 106580575 >Raw nodes per second: 1440278 >Total elapsed time: 74 >SMP time-to-ply measurement: 8.648649 >White(1): end >execution complete. > > >1.73M with a profiled exe using Intel's compiler. > >I'd be interested to see what he gets with the FTP exe of 18.15. FTP binary, no profile optimization, I think: hash table memory = 384M bytes. pawn hash table memory = 24M bytes. 5 piece tablebase files found 20370kb of RAM used for TB indices and decompression tables max threads set to 2 Crafty v18.15 (2 cpus) White(1): bench Running benchmark. . . ...... Total nodes: 86094416 Raw nodes per second: 1721888 Total elapsed time: 50 SMP time-to-ply measurement: 12.800000 White(1): mt=1 max threads set to 1 White(1): thread 1 exiting bench Running benchmark. . . ...... Total nodes: 84497760 Raw nodes per second: 1069591 Total elapsed time: 79 SMP time-to-ply measurement: 8.101266 White(1):
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.