Author: Slater Wold
Date: 09:57:54 07/04/03
Go up one level in this thread
On July 04, 2003 at 12:52:31, Brian Richardson wrote: >>>Opterons are *much* faster than Athlons. >>> >>>My 2x1.73s got about 1.7M nps. >> >> >>Opps! >> >>From the exe offered on Hyatt's website. >> >> >>EPD Kit revision date: 1996.04.21 >>found computer opening book file [./bookc.bin]. >> >>Crafty v18.15 (1 cpus) >> >>White(1): mt 2 >>max threads set to 2 >>White(1): bench >>Running benchmark. . . >>...... >>Total nodes: 106580575 >>Raw nodes per second: 1440278 >>Total elapsed time: 74 >>SMP time-to-ply measurement: 8.648649 >>White(1): end >>execution complete. >> >> >>1.73M with a profiled exe using Intel's compiler. >> >>I'd be interested to see what he gets with the FTP exe of 18.15. > >FTP binary, no profile optimization, I think: > >hash table memory = 384M bytes. >pawn hash table memory = 24M bytes. >5 piece tablebase files found >20370kb of RAM used for TB indices and decompression tables >max threads set to 2 > >Crafty v18.15 (2 cpus) > >White(1): bench >Running benchmark. . . >...... >Total nodes: 86094416 >Raw nodes per second: 1721888 >Total elapsed time: 50 >SMP time-to-ply measurement: 12.800000 >White(1): mt=1 >max threads set to 1 >White(1): thread 1 exiting >bench >Running benchmark. . . >...... >Total nodes: 84497760 >Raw nodes per second: 1069591 >Total elapsed time: 79 >SMP time-to-ply measurement: 8.101266 >White(1): So here we see that an Opteron @ 1.7Ghz is a *lot* faster than an Athlon 1.7Ghz using the same code. Looks like the Opteron excels at 32-bit code, Bob. ;) To the tune of about 20%.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.