Author: Grzegorz Sidorowicz
Date: 11:20:05 07/12/03
Go up one level in this thread
On July 11, 2003 at 09:02:03, Grzegorz Sidorowicz wrote:
[d]8/k7/3p4/p2P1p2/P2P1P2/8/8/K7 w - -
Now my problem is solved!!!
Problem was in null move but no only in null move.
I cut off from my program
if (height>=level-2 && wrpx<beta && val_gatunek[spr_poz]==UBOUND)
{
do_null=false;
}
and for example in place where is code:
case LBOUND:
if (wrpx>= beta)
{
if (antr>1)
ans_hash[antr].sx=-1;
return beta;
}
now I use code:
alpha=max(alpha,wrpx);
if (alpha>=beta)
{
if (antr>1)
ans_hash[antr].sx=-1;
return alpha;
}
and my program can find it on depth after 1 minute on Athlon 1700+
It is long time but now my program can do it! :-)
Now I have got next problem. Maybe null move in pown ednings it is bad idea?
What do you think about it?
Are you use null move in pown endings?
Do you think that I can have bug in null move prunning?
Best Regards and thank you gor all!!!
I love you !!!!
Now my program can solve 4 position more in WAC!!!!
wow!
Grzegorz
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.