Author: Sherry Washington
Date: 19:32:41 07/21/03
Go up one level in this thread
On July 21, 2003 at 22:19:46, Dann Corbit wrote: >On July 21, 2003 at 22:11:55, Sherry Washington wrote: > >>What will be your tactics be in this match? According to Kramnik, the >>anti-computer strategy no longer works, because machines made a huge step >>forward in positional understanding. > >Maybe. Maybe it's just deeper tactics. > >>Computers still have some problems with the evaluation of different types of >>positions, although overall Kramnik is right. > >Unsubstantiated. > >>You can’t win over a computer the >>way Kramnik beat Deep Junior in Dortmund (2000) anymore. > >Unsubstantiated. > >>The traditional >>anti-computer approach leads nowhere. > >Unsubstantiated. > > >>All these stories told by amateurs about >>winning against computer by playing a3 and b3 are mere words. > >Unsubstantiated. > >>It is possible to >>win a single game playing this way, but you can’t bet on it. > >Here, you are talking out of both sides of your mouth. You admit that it may be >possible to win. Nobodys says that any approach works all the time. > >>The real aim for >>humans is to find the elements of the anti-computer strategy in normal chess. > >Unsubstantiated opinion. At any rate, total computer dominance is completely >inevitable. Computer strength increases exponentially. Human strength does >not. > >>All these stories told by amateurs??? Perhaps he had Edward Nemeeth in mind? > >Just because someone is a great chess player, that does not mean that they have >a great understanding of computer chess. Well Computer Chess is a very broad Subject, I was specifically Discussing the area of Computer Chess Strength, which I do believe Kasparov would know alot more in that area then You. Ofcourse the programming aspects you would probally know alot more then him.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.