Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Bob....how strong Crafty on Blue Pacific (@3.9 trillion p/s)?

Author: Ernst A. Heinz

Date: 01:44:36 10/30/98

Go up one level in this thread


On October 29, 1998 at 21:58:24, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>On October 29, 1998 at 18:27:10, Terry Presgrove wrote:
>
>>Bob,Ed programers everywhere....just awe struck by the lastest
>>super computer just unveiled by V.P. Gore. At 3.9 Trilion calculations
>>per second just how strong would Crafty , Rebel, any of the comercialy
>>available programs be? Unless I misunderstood its Over 15,000 times faster
>>the the fastest PC's currrently available.  More than 5,800
>>processors....wouldn't it be nice to play around with this baby for just a day?
>
>
>first warning is a large number of processors...  ie it isn't a shared memory
>machine, which means that it is not easy or efficient to distribute the search
>on such machines.  If you have seen crafty on a 4 processor machine, and expect
>that to scale so such a machine, you'll be disappointed...
>
>However Sequent makes a 32 processor xeon-based machine that features a
>shared memory.  *that* would scream...  IE a NPS of something around 10M
>would be easy...

Hmh, AFAIK the Sequent machines are all NUMA types with a shared
*address space* but non-uniform memory access times. I sincerely doubt
that your strongly coupled DTS scales well on such machines.

But I am happy to be proven wrong by experimental results ... :-)

=Ernst=



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.