Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Qv3PN

Author: Frank Phillips

Date: 12:34:38 08/07/03

Go up one level in this thread


On August 07, 2003 at 15:18:55, Uri Blass wrote:

>On August 07, 2003 at 15:08:58, Frank Phillips wrote:
>
>>Calling my own chess ability modest would be a gross overstatement of my skill.
>>Any general insights from chess players (rather than computer analysis) on the
>>following position, which my program lost as black despite thinking it was
>>winning, would be welcome.
>>
>>[D]8/Q7/5pk1/5n2/6pp/8/5K2/8 b - -
>


>It is obvious that only white can win it.

Would you care to elaborate on obvious. (I am not suggesting you are wrong.).

>I believe that white is winning and I am surprised that your program had a
>different opinion.

Well I am touched that you are surprised .... unless this is an insult :-)
Looking at my static scores it seems that the passed pawn bonuses are too high -
at least for this position.

>
>A queen equal more than knight and 3 pawns and bonus for passed pawns is not
>enough compensation.

I wondered that with a piece and 3 connected passed pawns whether at some stage
the lone queen would have to exchange itself for some material leading to at
least a draw for black.

>
>Uri
>
>Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.