Author: Keith Long
Date: 13:51:23 08/15/03
Go up one level in this thread
On August 15, 2003 at 16:48:31, William Penn wrote: >WP, >I did a Shreddermark but consider it irrelevant. That's of no interest to me. >What matters to me is the kN/s in infinite analysis mode. Nothing else. The Shreddermark is based on nodes per second so i don't see why it wouldn/t matter to you, what was it anyway? >WP > > >On August 15, 2003 at 16:32:00, Timothy J. Frohlick wrote: > >>Bill, >> >>What is your Shredder Mark? >> >>TJF >> >>PS Get an AMD Processor....much faster than Celerons. >> >>On August 15, 2003 at 16:27:54, William Penn wrote: >> >>>I have had a 500MHz Celeron/256MB system for quite a few years. I just bought a >>>new 2.6GHz Celeron/512MB computer and was expecting my chess software to run >>>about 5X faster. It doesn't!? After considerable comparisons and benchmarking, >>>it's clear that it runs about 2.2X faster. My tests & benchmarks are based on >>>kN/s in infinite analysis mode using various practical chess positions and the >>>Shredder 7.04 UCI engine in the CB GUI. >>> >>>What is the most important single other factor (besides processor speed) that >>>would increase the speed of this engine in terms of kN/s? I'm sure that more RAM >>>wouldn't do very much. Is it "BUS speed", or "memory speed", or "processor cache >>>size", or "processor type", or what? I'm not interested in minor factors, just >>>the most important one. >>>WP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.