Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: MTD(f) and hash table size

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 08:34:28 08/17/03

Go up one level in this thread

On August 17, 2003 at 11:15:38, Dan Andersson wrote:

> My experience is that always replace is substantially better than new >= old.
>That goes for plain A-B, Aspiration, PVS and MTD(f) all.
>
>MvH Dan Andersson

Is your experience for test positions or for games?

I have no doubt that if you do new>=old and do not clear the hash tables you may
have problems in games because of old entries.

Uri

• Re: MTD(f) and hash table size Dan Andersson 10:34:07 08/17/03
  • Re: MTD(f) and hash table size Dieter Buerssner 13:24:24 08/17/03
    • Re: MTD(f) and hash table size Uri Blass 14:17:50 08/17/03
  • Re: MTD(f) and hash table size Uri Blass 10:41:35 08/17/03
    • Re: MTD(f) and hash table size Dan Andersson 11:27:56 08/17/03

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.