Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 03:08:40 08/22/03
Go up one level in this thread
On August 22, 2003 at 05:31:13, Uri Blass wrote: >On August 22, 2003 at 04:53:11, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: > >>On August 22, 2003 at 04:43:52, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>Maybe there is a misunderstanding. >>>I did not mean to say that it is statistically significant when I said >>>evidence. >> >>There's a difference between an indication and evidence. > >Ok > >I will use the word indication later. > >I thought that the meaning of evidence is different. > >There are cases when a person is considered to be not quilty of a crime because >the evidence against him is not enough(I hope that I do not do wrong >translation from hebrew to english). You are right here I think, but stating it this way avoids confusion. >I see no reason not to make a decision to use 282 >Using 279 is also a decision and using 282 seems to me slightly better >decision. There may be other factors, i.e. the change makes the code more complex which prevents further improvements. -- GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.