Author: Uri Blass
Date: 03:18:19 08/22/03
Go up one level in this thread
On August 22, 2003 at 06:08:40, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On August 22, 2003 at 05:31:13, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On August 22, 2003 at 04:53:11, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >> >>>On August 22, 2003 at 04:43:52, Uri Blass wrote: >>> >>>>Maybe there is a misunderstanding. >>>>I did not mean to say that it is statistically significant when I said >>>>evidence. >>> >>>There's a difference between an indication and evidence. >> >>Ok >> >>I will use the word indication later. >> >>I thought that the meaning of evidence is different. >> >>There are cases when a person is considered to be not quilty of a crime because >>the evidence against him is not enough(I hope that I do not do wrong >translation from hebrew to english). > >You are right here I think, but stating it this way avoids confusion. > >>I see no reason not to make a decision to use 282 >>Using 279 is also a decision and using 282 seems to me slightly better >>decision. > >There may be other factors, i.e. the change makes the code more complex >which prevents further improvements. > >-- >GCP In this case I agree that it is better to continue with 279. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.