Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 09:08:18 08/22/03
Go up one level in this thread
On August 22, 2003 at 11:55:31, Steven Edwards wrote: >If a program can play chess, then it is a chess progam. Meh. It was designed to solve problems, not play games. That's a significant design difference that makes the comparison in the first post meaningless in my view. >>As you just said, it was meant for tactical (and specifically mate) searches, >>not for playing games. > >No, in the original paper, only one example (WCSAC #398) is a forced mate. All >the other searches are for material gain. Can you post a few more examples from the original paper (together with Paradises performance)? -- GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.