Author: ERIQ
Date: 19:58:46 08/24/03
Go up one level in this thread
On August 24, 2003 at 22:26:13, Fernando Villegas wrote: >a)Great GUI, wonderfull boards, you really can play with them. >b)Engine by Kittinger strong enough to kill almost anywone here, but just as any >other top program does anyway. The difference: a more "coruscated" style, I do >not find a better word to define it. You will feel it at once compared to any >other top engine. But of course this is a very subjetive judgement. >c)Search lot less deep than any of the Chessbase family. It takes time to get >12-14 plys. My PC is an Athlon running at 1400 or so Mhz >d) not so fast seach speed as competence. Around 200 Knodes/second in middle >game. I would say as an explanation that the engine has lot more knowledge than >average and/or has a somewhat old fashion search inclined to full width in some >plys. >e) nothing specially great or bad to say about openings >e) Very flexible or curious or extreme way of handling the time. It can expend >easily 15-20 minutes in some positions, then 4-10 seconds in another. >These partial observations are the product of three games at 40 in 60 minutes. >All victories for the beast, but not crushing at all. >All in all I am happy: lot less features than average Chessbase products, but >pretty graphic -important to me- and clearly different style of playing. What >else you can ask? >Fernando Thx for the review. I know you have play other wchess engines so do you think this one is the best. Also do you plan to test against other top engines like fritz, shredder, rebel, tiger etc. If so please post results. sign, Eriq
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.