Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 23:24:00 09/02/03
Go up one level in this thread
On September 02, 2003 at 22:34:49, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>Been working a year fulltime now :) >> > >So? It took you over a year to get your parallel search working. It took >me weeks. > >:) In all fairness, he did a full DTS implementation, including rewriting the program to a nonrecursive search, while you took an easy way out. Diep's parallel performance does seem to be better than what you and I are getting. I wouldn't make that design decision for the common 2 or 4 way machines you are most likely to end up working with, but given that he's now working with 512, I'm sure it has payed off handsomely in the meantime. Likewise, optimizing a program for Opteron NUMA is a whole different animal than optimizing it for a 512 CPU NUMA Sun Altix. I agree optimizing Crafty for the Opteron won't take an entire rewrite, but please don't go claiming that 'NUMA-Crafty' will run well on any NUMA machine. -- GCP
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.