Author: Peter Skinner
Date: 08:52:49 09/11/03
Go up one level in this thread
On September 11, 2003 at 10:57:14, Torstein Hall wrote: >On September 11, 2003 at 10:42:57, Peter Skinner wrote: > >>The 5 3 games were played on a PIV 2.0 Ghz using 256 megs of ram for hash >>tables, and the 60 10 games were played on a PIV 2.8ghz with the same hash >>tables. Somnus is Hiarcs 9, epanek is Deep Sjeng 1.5, and Crafty is of course >>Crafty. Hiarcs scored +2 =4 -7. One thing I did notice is it is a slow engine, >>averaging 190knps on the 2.0 ghz machine, and 249knps on the 2.8 machine. The >>other thing I noticed is that it came out of book very quickly in almost every >>game. Usually around move 9. > >Interestingly bad score for Hiarcs 9! > >Just a few questions. Do you know What hardware the other programs where running >on? >How do you run CB engines on ICC? Manual input or is there a way to use CB >engines automaticly on ICC? >The rating suddenly does a jump from 2300++ range to the 2800++ range. So I >suppose there must have been some other games in between? > >Torstein The reason there is a rating jump is there are two different time controls here. One is blitz 5 3 the other is "standard" 60 10. That is the reason for the rating difference. I use the Ebbi adapter to automate play on the ICC server. Most of the other programs are dual machines. Crafty is a dual xeon 2.8 ghz, epanek is a dual ahtlon something... I am just a single processor machine. Peter.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.