Author: Mikael Bäckman
Date: 14:48:46 09/19/03
Go up one level in this thread
On September 19, 2003 at 15:00:55, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On September 19, 2003 at 11:48:09, Mikael Bäckman wrote: > >>On September 19, 2003 at 11:14:29, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >> >>>Hello, >>> >>>I'm looking for positions to search very deep with a cpu or 500 which are >>>interesting to search deep. Seemingly a whole machine must get reserved for DIEP >>>world champs 2003. The NWO/NCF perhaps needs to pay for the cpu hours also >>>during the night says SARA (there is 7 organisations involved and i have written >>>at least 1 page for each processor to get it so i won't even start quoting all >>>the organisations involved). >>> >>>Most jobs run like 2 weeks or so at say for example 32 processors, so all those >>>jobs cannot get started trivially in the night. >>> >>>Anyway more negotiations will be there, because the world champs like this will >>>cost 80000 cpu hours. >>> >>>This is all internal talks. In case any of such scenario happens or even between >>>rounds when diep finishes sooner its games, there sometimes is a few hours left >>>to run diep at 500 cpu's at for example 1 position each run. >>> >>>that's 250Ghz with around 200GB hashtables in total. >>> >>>So this allows some massive deep calculations. I'm looking for cool positions to >>>try. >>> >>>Please don't mention the openings position, i'm already using that now and it >>>isn't very interesting at all to search that one deep. >> >>How deep have you searched the opening position and what is the PV you get? > >You can search the opening very deep if you want to. I have had diep versions in >the past where i have put a big bonus for center pawns and a king being safe >behind a shelter. So it wants to castle badly then and put pawns badly in >center. Yes, I know. :) I was merely interested in what the 'normal' 500 cpu version thinks about the position. /Mikael > >It gets depths like 22 ply easily then. > >So openings position is not so interesting simply. Big bonuses guiding the >development in a clear way are more important than the number of CPU's there in >itself is. > >But still depths are big yes :) > >> >> >> >>>feel free to email to me about this: diep@xs4all.nl >>> >>>Best regards, >>>Vincent
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.