Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: positions to search deep for hours at 500 cpu's

Author: Dieter Buerssner

Date: 08:51:45 09/20/03

Go up one level in this thread

On September 20, 2003 at 03:49:13, Drexel,Michael wrote:

>Can you explain that please? 89.Kd6 Bd3 90.Bg7+?? or 89.Kd6 Bg4 90.Bg7+??

Oops, thank you for pointing this out. May likeley be a bug (or some stupidness
out of HT, but it really looks too stupid). I also used an experimental version.
I am trying to find it out (but because of the long thinking times, it might not
be trivial).

Regards,
Dieter

• Re: positions to search deep for hours at 500 cpu's Dieter Buerssner 10:11:35 09/20/03
  • Re: positions to search deep for hours at 500 cpu's Drexel,Michael 10:37:34 09/20/03
    • Re: positions to search deep for hours at 500 cpu's Dieter Buerssner 14:11:26 09/20/03
• Re: positions to search deep for hours at 500 cpu's Uri Blass 09:02:50 09/20/03

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.