Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: positions to search deep for hours at 500 cpu's

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 09:02:50 09/20/03

Go up one level in this thread


On September 20, 2003 at 11:51:45, Dieter Buerssner wrote:

>On September 20, 2003 at 03:49:13, Drexel,Michael wrote:
>
>>Can you explain that please? 89.Kd6 Bd3 90.Bg7+?? or 89.Kd6 Bg4 90.Bg7+??
>
>Oops, thank you for pointing this out. May likeley be a bug (or some stupidness
>out of HT, but it really looks too stupid). I also used an experimental version.
>I am trying to find it out (but because of the long thinking times, it might not
>be trivial).
>
>Regards,
>Dieter

At least it is less than an hour and the first time there is a  stupid line in
your analysis is only after 33 minutes.

2162801813 33:36.8   2.63 22t  89.Kd6 Bg4 90.Bg7+ Kg8 91.Kc7 Ng3H 92.Be5H Nf5H
                               93.Bg3H {HT}

Uri




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.