Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 16:50:13 09/30/03
Go up one level in this thread
On September 30, 2003 at 19:33:30, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On September 30, 2003 at 19:30:30, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>On September 30, 2003 at 19:27:38, Peter Collins wrote: >> >>>On September 30, 2003 at 19:22:26, Dann Corbit wrote: >>> >>>>On September 30, 2003 at 19:14:02, Peter Collins wrote: >>>> >>>>>My apologies for the format (from memory) of the position I'd like to analyse, >>>>>but I am at a terminal outside of where I can access the gamescore: >>>>> >>>>>Black to make his 29th move: >>>>> >>>>>3q2k1 >>>>>5p1p >>>>>1n2nbpB >>>>>1P1p4 >>>>>1Qp3P1 >>>>>7P >>>>>1P3PK1 >>>>>1B2R3 >>>>> >>>>>Sorry if this is the wrong forum, I'm new here. >>>>> >>>>>A friend of mine played black against Jeremy Silman..he only looked at about a >>>>>trillion nodes on slower machines... >>>> >>>>[D]3q2k1/5p1p/1n2nbpB/1P1p4/1Qp3P1/7P/1P3PK1/1B2R3 b - - >>> >>>Thanks Dan, indeed, this is the correct position. >>> >>>I think the one of the best variation so far goes... >>> >>>29...d4 30.Be4 d3 31.Qd2 g5 32.h4 gxh4 and from here I am using a 2800Barton, >>>1.5MB Ram to analyse it. >> >>1.5 GB, I suppose. >> >>Do you have a preference for what program to analyze with? >> >>Many programs will never make it to 24 ply [*] >> >>[*] By 'never' I mean that not in several years of continuous time. > >at a 486 sure :) > >But how about 500 processors? > >2 hours or so? Speaking of such, I would be curious to see what sort of output you can generate on any of the positions you mentioned before or on this one.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.