Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 03:49:24 10/01/03
Go up one level in this thread
On September 30, 2003 at 19:50:13, Dann Corbit wrote: >On September 30, 2003 at 19:33:30, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>On September 30, 2003 at 19:30:30, Dann Corbit wrote: >> >>>On September 30, 2003 at 19:27:38, Peter Collins wrote: >>> >>>>On September 30, 2003 at 19:22:26, Dann Corbit wrote: >>>> >>>>>On September 30, 2003 at 19:14:02, Peter Collins wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>My apologies for the format (from memory) of the position I'd like to analyse, >>>>>>but I am at a terminal outside of where I can access the gamescore: >>>>>> >>>>>>Black to make his 29th move: >>>>>> >>>>>>3q2k1 >>>>>>5p1p >>>>>>1n2nbpB >>>>>>1P1p4 >>>>>>1Qp3P1 >>>>>>7P >>>>>>1P3PK1 >>>>>>1B2R3 >>>>>> >>>>>>Sorry if this is the wrong forum, I'm new here. >>>>>> >>>>>>A friend of mine played black against Jeremy Silman..he only looked at about a >>>>>>trillion nodes on slower machines... >>>>> >>>>>[D]3q2k1/5p1p/1n2nbpB/1P1p4/1Qp3P1/7P/1P3PK1/1B2R3 b - - >>>> >>>>Thanks Dan, indeed, this is the correct position. >>>> >>>>I think the one of the best variation so far goes... >>>> >>>>29...d4 30.Be4 d3 31.Qd2 g5 32.h4 gxh4 and from here I am using a 2800Barton, >>>>1.5MB Ram to analyse it. >>> >>>1.5 GB, I suppose. >>> >>>Do you have a preference for what program to analyze with? >>> >>>Many programs will never make it to 24 ply [*] >>> >>>[*] By 'never' I mean that not in several years of continuous time. >> >>at a 486 sure :) >> >>But how about 500 processors? >> >>2 hours or so? > >Speaking of such, I would be curious to see what sort of output you can generate >on any of the positions you mentioned before or on this one. I'm possibly at least as interested like you to know. All i know is that 130 cpu's is already spectacular. Can't wait for 500 runs to be scheduled.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.