Author: Bruce Moreland
Date: 20:21:20 11/08/98
Go up one level in this thread
On November 08, 1998 at 18:26:06, Lawrence S. Tamarkin wrote: >I pretty much agree with what you say below, but their is a limit to what >moderater's can do, and what should be left to the various posters discretion >and common sence. > >Just one example, there were a couple of things I found troubling about Shaun; >1. He seemed on a personal 'mission' to prove some (many) negatives about ICD. >Even if he is/were right, there was no reason to be on a personal vendetta, as >he seemed to be. And certainly his structuring of his argument could have been >more carefully worded. Different Shaun, I think. There was a Sean Evans and there was a Shaun Graham. >2. Just because some posters post against your view, hell, even agianst you, >does not require you get into an unending personal herumph, in an attempt to >prove their logic faulty and them wrong. Throwing in stuff, like Calling >Crafty, Crappy is also a waste of everyones time. (I believe, the consenses of >many). This is Sean, not Shaun. bruce
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.