Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: SSDF and the autoplayer

Author: Mark Young

Date: 04:24:01 11/10/98

Go up one level in this thread


On November 10, 1998 at 07:11:25, Ed Schröder wrote:

>>>I can assure you no revenge or similar feelings are involved in my
>>>decision. I just have practical objections.
>
>>>As you all know I have argued against hidden autoplayers. This from
>>>February till August/September. In public as well in email with the SSDF. I then
>>>dropped the whole issue as no compromise was hanging in the air as the
>>>SSDF rejected my wish to exclude hidden autoplayers for future testing.
>
>>>So Rebel10 was released without auto232 based on the above.
>
>>>I am not prepared to make a patch for a) reasons of time b) costs.
>
>>>I am not prepared to trash all Rebel10 cdroms in my office. I am not
>>>prepared to make costs for a new master and have the thing duplicated
>>>another xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx times because it took the SSDF 8-9 months to
>>>come to the same conclusion I have argued for so long. The (good) news
>>>just came one month too late.
>
>>>- Ed -
>
>>My advice Ed,
>>don't let your argues with SSDF affect your customers.
>>They don't care about SSDF, they care about Rebel10.
>
>>Make the patch for downloading. Keep selling the CDroms as is.
>>
>>//Peter
>
>>make the patch and keep the cdroms as is.
>
>
>Ok, makes sense. I give in. There will be an upgrade anyway and I will
>include (hopefully improved) auto232 support as well then.
>
>- Ed -

I knew you would not let us down.....THANK YOU ED :)



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.