Author: Ed Schröder
Date: 04:11:25 11/10/98
Go up one level in this thread
>>I can assure you no revenge or similar feelings are involved in my >>decision. I just have practical objections. >>As you all know I have argued against hidden autoplayers. This from >>February till August/September. In public as well in email with the SSDF. I then >>dropped the whole issue as no compromise was hanging in the air as the >>SSDF rejected my wish to exclude hidden autoplayers for future testing. >>So Rebel10 was released without auto232 based on the above. >>I am not prepared to make a patch for a) reasons of time b) costs. >>I am not prepared to trash all Rebel10 cdroms in my office. I am not >>prepared to make costs for a new master and have the thing duplicated >>another xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx times because it took the SSDF 8-9 months to >>come to the same conclusion I have argued for so long. The (good) news >>just came one month too late. >>- Ed - >My advice Ed, >don't let your argues with SSDF affect your customers. >They don't care about SSDF, they care about Rebel10. >Make the patch for downloading. Keep selling the CDroms as is. > >//Peter >make the patch and keep the cdroms as is. Ok, makes sense. I give in. There will be an upgrade anyway and I will include (hopefully improved) auto232 support as well then. - Ed -
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.