Author: Peter Fendrich
Date: 03:49:53 11/10/98
Go up one level in this thread
On November 10, 1998 at 03:31:48, Ed Schröder wrote: >I can assure you no revenge or similar feelings are involved in my decision. I >just have practical objections. > >As you all know I have argued against hidden autoplayers. This from February >till August/September. In public as well in email with the SSDF. I then dropped >the whole issue as no compromise was hanging in the air as the SSDF rejected >my wish to exclude hidden autoplayers for future testing. > >So Rebel10 was released without auto232 based on the above. > >I am not prepared to make a patch for a) reasons of time b) costs. > >I am not prepared to trash all Rebel10 cdroms in my office. I am not >prepared to make costs for a new master and have the thing duplicated >another xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx times because it took the SSDF 8-9 months to >come to the same conclusion I have argued for so long. The (good) news >just came one month too late. > >- Ed - My advice Ed, don't let your argues with SSDF affect your customers. They don't care about SSDF, they care about Rebel10. Make the patch for downloading. Keep selling the CDroms as is. //Peter make the patch and keep the cdroms as is.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.