Author: Uri Blass
Date: 13:32:30 10/26/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 26, 2003 at 16:22:04, Uri Blass wrote: <snipped> >It seems that Genius was relatively lucky to get endgames with passed pawns for >both sides. > >I do not see this kind of endgame so often in games of movei against other >players. > >The same Movei that you tested play in another tournament and it got endgames in >all of its games > >It has 2.5/3 against gaviota,Dorky and Beowulf > >It won equal or better endgames and drew an inferior endgame so I do not feel >that endgame is a major weakness of it inspite of the fact that it does not >search deep enough. I forgot a link to the relevant tournament see http://home.arcor.de/wccl/ league III The engine is the same except some bug that I fixed in the version that I sent you and is not relevant for playing strength. Maybe Genius is relatively strong in endgame or relatively better against weaker engines and I did not claim that I think that movei is not weaker than genius2 but that the difference is smaller than result of 6.5-1.5. I remember matches of you between genius on 486 and palm tiger when genius with a small hardware advantage beated palm tiger almost every game and I do not think that the difference in playing strength was more than 200 elo. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.