Author: Uri Blass
Date: 13:22:04 10/26/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 26, 2003 at 16:03:11, Peter Berger wrote: >On October 26, 2003 at 15:29:46, Uri Blass wrote: > >>I believe that movei of today is slightly weaker than Genius2 but I guess that >>6.5-1.5 is too high to give the correct difference. > >Let's wait and see. After 3 games with same conditions the score Yace-Genius 2 >is 1.5-1.5 ( 3 draws) > >I'll be on travel for some days, see you. I will try to improve movei and my plan is to try to get improvement in order of moves in the near future. It seems that Genius was relatively lucky to get endgames with passed pawns for both sides. I do not see this kind of endgame so often in games of movei against other players. The same Movei that you tested play in another tournament and it got endgames in all of its games It has 2.5/3 against gaviota,Dorky and Beowulf It won equal or better endgames and drew an inferior endgame so I do not feel that endgame is a major weakness of it inspite of the fact that it does not search deep enough. > >> >>Maybe in a long match it can be even worse because movei has almost no >>learning except learning to change first move after seeing a bad evaluation >>against itself(If I remember correctly more than 5 pawns against itself) that >>prevents losing the same game twice in a match of 4 games. >> > >Genius 2 has no learner at all. > >Peter In this case there is no problem and if the book of genius2 is big enough the learner of movei has also no influence. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.