Author: Ulrich Tuerke
Date: 05:33:59 10/27/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 26, 2003 at 16:22:04, Uri Blass wrote: >On October 26, 2003 at 16:03:11, Peter Berger wrote: > >>On October 26, 2003 at 15:29:46, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>I believe that movei of today is slightly weaker than Genius2 but I guess that >>>6.5-1.5 is too high to give the correct difference. >> >>Let's wait and see. After 3 games with same conditions the score Yace-Genius 2 >>is 1.5-1.5 ( 3 draws) >> >>I'll be on travel for some days, see you. > >I will try to improve movei and >my plan is to try to get improvement in order of moves in the near future. > >It seems that Genius was relatively lucky to get endgames with passed pawns for >both sides. Formerly, I would let Comet often play against Genius. Several times, I had observed that Lang must have implemented some very smart knowlege regarding passed pawn races. Whatever it is, it is effective (and it's a secrete, I guess). Regards, Uli > >I do not see this kind of endgame so often in games of movei against other >players. > >The same Movei that you tested play in another tournament and it got endgames in >all of its games > >It has 2.5/3 against gaviota,Dorky and Beowulf > >It won equal or better endgames and drew an inferior endgame so I do not feel >that endgame is a major weakness of it inspite of the fact that it does not >search deep enough. > >> >>> >>>Maybe in a long match it can be even worse because movei has almost no >>>learning except learning to change first move after seeing a bad evaluation >>>against itself(If I remember correctly more than 5 pawns against itself) that >>>prevents losing the same game twice in a match of 4 games. >>> >> >>Genius 2 has no learner at all. >> >>Peter > >In this case there is no problem and if the book of genius2 is big enough the >learner of movei has also no influence. > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.