Author: Les Walker
Date: 15:36:53 11/10/98
Go up one level in this thread
On November 10, 1998 at 10:53:16, Tord Romstad wrote: >On November 10, 1998 at 08:57:48, Les Walker wrote: > >>Personally, I think the autoplayer issue is BS, especially in light of the >>current controvery of autoplayers. If it were my rating list, I would truely >>want to know which program is strongest. It is the nature of computer/chess >>enthusiests. Tell me you are not interested in knowing who the true champion is. >>BTW - I have also heard the "it takes time and money" argument. It does not >>hold water either. > >Why is this so terribly hard to understand? The SSDF currently does not have >any members who wants to spend thousands of hours testing programs manually. >How are they supposed to test CM6000? The concept you mention is easy enough to understand. I just disagree. IMO - the SSDF list should be taken as seriously as the MTV Music Awards, or the Academy Awards programs. Why don't we just agree to disagree and leave it it that. You have your opinion about the SSDF list, and I have mine. I simply posted my "opinion," not provable facts, as it is not important to me, much like the MTV awards. Kind Regards, Les Walker > >Tord
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.