Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: 64-Bit random numbers

Author: Johan de Koning

Date: 22:36:17 10/30/03

Go up one level in this thread


On October 30, 2003 at 09:44:48, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>On October 29, 2003 at 13:39:03, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:

>>It's like saying using 'goto' is ok in a programming environment. Where this is
>>certainly true, it should not be a policy to do so :)
>
>Eh?  _every_ program you write has goto's.  (aka jumps).  They are not
>bad.  In fact, they are _unavoidable_.

OT1: They *are* avoidable.
Any finite algorithm that does not depend on mid-execution input (typically
time) can be written as 1 single expression. It would of course be huge and
run rather slowly without quantum computing.

OT2: You *know* what he means.
There's no need to remove the quotes around 'goto' and change the subject,
just to contradict.

BTW: this isn't personal.
In fact I'd advice *everyone* not to contradict Vincent.
That would halve the posting volume, i.e. raising the signal/noise by 6 dB. :-)

... Johan



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.