Author: Bob Durrett
Date: 07:16:27 11/16/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 16, 2003 at 05:55:03, Mark Young wrote: >On November 16, 2003 at 05:20:04, Gerhard Sonnabend wrote: > >>Hi ! >> >>As you can see since (deep)fritz 7 there is no progress against other engines. >>It looks like that frans has tried to optimize his creation for playing >>against strong humans - a good decision. >> >>P3-Rating-List (30m/g = rapidchess) >> >> Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. Draws >> 1 Shredder 7.04 2760 27 38 358 69.3 % 2619 26.3 % >>... >> 5 Deep Fritz 7 2699 19 22 815 65.1 % 2591 31.3 % >>... >> 8 Fritz 8.0.0.26 2698 24 27 520 64.0 % 2597 30.4 % >> 9 Fritz 7.0.0.2 2696 22 24 608 64.7 % 2591 35.7 % >>10 Fritz 8.0.0.23 2696 23 24 597 62.6 % 2606 32.2 % >>... >>12 Fritz 8.0.0.5 2695 22 24 607 64.7 % 2590 33.4 % >>... >>15 Fritz 7.0.0.6 2681 23 23 620 62.0 % 2596 34.4 % >>.. >>17 Deep Fritz 6 2675 21 21 688 62.9 % 2583 37.2 % >> >>The complete list and more you can find on: >>www.pcschach.de >> >>Best G.S > >X3D Fritz still needs some positional understanding playing humans. Tactically >Fritz holds its own even against GM Kasparov, and with an awesome defensive >skill Fritz is very hard to beat. > >I am not sure if X3D Fritz is better then Shredder 7.04 looking at the games. Unfortunately, we have no information as to how Shredder would perform on the very fast computer being used for the Kasparov games. Bob D. >With X3D Fritz's positonal errors in game 2 for example. Moves 9. d4? move 17. >Rb1?! and move 20 N3d2?! look to be positionally wrong. > >It is very hard to judge for sure after only 2 games and X3D Fritz up +1 against >the strongest human player in history.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.