Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 09:37:21 11/16/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 16, 2003 at 10:16:27, Bob Durrett wrote:
>On November 16, 2003 at 05:55:03, Mark Young wrote:
>
>>On November 16, 2003 at 05:20:04, Gerhard Sonnabend wrote:
>>
>>>Hi !
>>>
>>>As you can see since (deep)fritz 7 there is no progress against other engines.
>>>It looks like that frans has tried to optimize his creation for playing
>>>against strong humans - a good decision.
>>>
>>>P3-Rating-List (30m/g = rapidchess)
>>>
>>> Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. Draws
>>> 1 Shredder 7.04 2760 27 38 358 69.3 % 2619 26.3 %
>>>...
>>> 5 Deep Fritz 7 2699 19 22 815 65.1 % 2591 31.3 %
>>>...
>>> 8 Fritz 8.0.0.26 2698 24 27 520 64.0 % 2597 30.4 %
>>> 9 Fritz 7.0.0.2 2696 22 24 608 64.7 % 2591 35.7 %
>>>10 Fritz 8.0.0.23 2696 23 24 597 62.6 % 2606 32.2 %
>>>...
>>>12 Fritz 8.0.0.5 2695 22 24 607 64.7 % 2590 33.4 %
>>>...
>>>15 Fritz 7.0.0.6 2681 23 23 620 62.0 % 2596 34.4 %
>>>..
>>>17 Deep Fritz 6 2675 21 21 688 62.9 % 2583 37.2 %
>>>
>>>The complete list and more you can find on:
>>>www.pcschach.de
>>>
>>>Best G.S
>>
>>X3D Fritz still needs some positional understanding playing humans. Tactically
>>Fritz holds its own even against GM Kasparov, and with an awesome defensive
>>skill Fritz is very hard to beat.
>>
>>I am not sure if X3D Fritz is better then Shredder 7.04 looking at the games.
>
>
>Unfortunately, we have no information as to how Shredder would perform on the
>very fast computer being used for the Kasparov games.
>
>Bob D.
>
>
>>With X3D Fritz's positonal errors in game 2 for example. Moves 9. d4? move 17.
>>Rb1?! and move 20 N3d2?! look to be positionally wrong.
According to Kasparov 17.Rb1 is an interesting move and
not at all a bad one.
Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.