Author: Aaron Gordon
Date: 17:35:03 12/08/03
Go up one level in this thread
The page is down at the moment for me.. but go to www.tabsnet.com I don't trust the haveland site as they don't screen the results at ALL. Someone even posted some fake playstation 2 'mod' running ps2 faster than some of the higher clocked Athlons.. when in fact the Playstation 2 chip is quite slow, much slower than the P3-733 thats in the xbox even. On tabsnet Enrico's Athlon XP 2525MHz pulled in 2 minutes, 15 seconds for the "Chessmark". A P4-2.76GHz came in at 3 minutes and 5 seconds (slightly slower than the 3 minute and 3 second Athlon XP 1.86GHz). The Opteron 1.8GHz? Well, that came in at 57 seconds. :) Now for the "Newmark" povray test... Opteron 1.8GHz: 22 minutes, 34 seconds Athlon XP 2.52GHz: 23 minutes, 46 seconds Pentium 4 3.45GHz: 27 minutes, 33 seconds Pentium 4 3.32GHz: 29 minutes, 38 seconds Look at all of the other results.. All Athlon/Opterons in the top score. Now, go to Haveland and post a bogus result.. it is up there immediately. Try posting one with Tabsnet, they'll filter out the garbage or make you verify your result. On December 08, 2003 at 16:25:49, Eugene Nalimov wrote: >On December 08, 2003 at 14:32:15, Aaron Gordon wrote: > >>On December 08, 2003 at 13:08:41, Slater Wold wrote: >> >>>On December 08, 2003 at 12:55:36, Leen Ammeraal wrote: >>> >>>>I saw the Athlon 64 based >>>>"PC Vobis Power 64 3200+ XD" (euro 1299). >>>> >>>>How does this compare with an Intel P4 3.2 EE ? >>>>Which would you prefer for chess? >>>>Leen >>> >>>According to http://www.hothardware.com/hh_files/CCAM/a64fx_51_launch.shtml, the >>>3.2EE would be faster. >> >>Shame they only tested (except for UT2k3) applications where the P4 does decent. >>As I said in a previous post.. where is DVD2AVI (where an Athlon does best for >>Mpeg encoding). It is much faster than XMpeg for me (on my XP). Also, in Povray >>(a renderer a normal person would use, rather than drop $4000 for one of the >>ones they use to test) the Athlon is a good 50%+ faster than the P4. In 64bit >>mode it is something like 3 times faster. The Athlon FX is even faster than the >>XP. Expecially for chess, which I believe what he was asking about in the first >>place. > >Guess which system is the fastest for Povray? > >http://www.haveland.com/index.htm?povbench/index.php > >:-) > >Thanks, >Eugene > >>Go test Fritz, Shredder, Crafty, etc. on a 2.2GHz FX. You'll see in 32bit mode >>you'll gain 20-30% over an Athlon XP (which is already faster than a P4 for >>chess). >> >>About PCMark and 3DMark (all made by madonion/futuremark).. they're all bunk. >>PCMark is biased towards the P4 and now that ATI slapped them with some cash >>they're biased towards ATI. If you don't believe me, try this. Get a Pentium 2 >>400MHz (yes, 400MHz) and a Radeon 9700 pro, 9800, whatever. Now, put a Geforce4 >>ti4600 in a P4-3.2EE, Athlon FX 2.8GHz, you name it.. doesn't matter. The >>Pentium 2 400MHz will get a higher 3DMark. Why? Well, thats what happens when >>you dump a ton of cash on a company.. they do what you want. >> >>The semi-technical reason why it is like this was something nvidia found out. >>They found that the way futuremark did the pixel shaders was ridiculous. Adding >>a specific loop (or something like that, you can search for it on google) that >>only the ATI chips could do.. and the entire test setup was this crap. In real >>life, and in any other 3D program the Geforce4 on the faster CPU would >>absolutely kill the P2-400MHz with the 9700 Pro. This is an example of the crap >>companies do to fool customers. >> >>I've done the testing (P4-2.53 @ 3.32ghz and limited testing at 3.5ghz) for >>chess and other programs, my Athlon XP at 2.5GHz beat it in 95% of the tests and >>ALL of the chess programs. An Athlon FX 2.2GHz is 20-30% faster than an XP at >>2.2GHz, so you can figure it'd be equal to an XP 2.64-2.86GHz.. which is >>definitely faster than any P4 (even if they clocked it up to 4GHz and more) to >>date. If you want the fastest, go for this: >>http://www.aceshardware.com/read.jsp?id=60000268 >> >>Plus, if you get a P4-3.2EE what do you think you'll be doing when lots of the >>chess programs go to 64bit, and most of everything else? You'll end up buying an >>Athlon FX.. the P4 will get smoked even more when 64bit stuff hits the scene. >>You can get one now and when everything switches over you won't have to upgrade >>at all. If you do go with a P4-EE you'll just be one of many who wonder why it >>isn't as fast as the 'review' pages say. >> >>If in doubt, test it yourself.. I did.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.